What I Want To See In Hardware

I’m not the only one who wasn’t excited by this year’s E3 presentations.  In terms of games, it was obviously bad.  Actually, it sort of feels like everyone just accepts that the software will all be bad every year, and it’s become this kind of meta-game of trying to come up with something to say about them.  Often, it will be some big discussion about something tangential to the actual software itself (like the recent hullabaloo over the latest Tomb Raider game).  Anything to keep our minds off of how our favorite hobby became a joke over a decade ago, was killed, and is now stuck to the bottom of our shoe like toilet paper.

But nevermind about the software.  Today I want to talk about the hardware.  Actually, though, I don’t want to talk about Nintendo, Sony, or Microsoft’s hardware.  What is there to really say?  They’ve all missed the mark.  They’ve come nowhere near doing anything that would interest game-players (or game designers).

I may temper that a bit and say that Nintendo almost came close with the Wii U.  It was almost the right idea.

Oooh, SO close. Unfortunately the Wii U can barely support even two of these things

I’d like you to please imagine this very simple scenario…

Imagine you and three friends are sitting around in your living room, each with tablets in your laps.  Each tablet has its own controller attached to the bottom of it, and the screen is a large (slightly larger than an iPad, maybe) surface.  All four of you have one of these tablets in your lap.  They connect wirelessly with each other (just like a Nintendo DS does), and they can also be hooked up to your Wifi.

What’s so cool about this?  Mainly, two things:

 

Secret Information

When I first saw the Wii U’s separate screen, the first thing I thought was about the possibilities for secret information among players.  The idea that there could be one player who has game information that another doesn’t could usher in a whole new generation of actually new games.  People who play boardgames know exactly what I’m talking about.  Traitor games, simultaneous action games, Poker — really, any card game where you have a “hand” has an element of “he has some information that I don’t, and I have to try to figure out what that information is”.

This is an example of a hardware innovation that – unlike touchscreens and motion-waggle accoutrement and Sega Action Chairs – actually does invite incredible new kinds of gameplay.  Imagine playing a traitor game (for those of you who don’t know what that is, it’s a cooperative game that has one or more “traitors” whose identities are hidden), in real time, for example.Before I go on, I know what some of you may be thinking “but that’s already possible with online play!”  True, although certain kinds of games don’t make for good online-gaming experiences.  Specifically, party-games, racing games, cooperative games, fighting games, and a few other kinds of games.  But even with that said — sure, you can do some of this online.  But wouldn’t it be great to be able to do it in a room with friends as well?

EDIT:  Blake, our lead artist left a comment which I simply have to quote here:

“There could be D&D type games, with one tablet holder as the GM, the others as players, all with their own information available to them.  There could be a much, much more elaborate “Battleship” type game with tons of intricate shelling/deduction mechanisms.  Like Keith said, a traitor game in real time, where you have to be managing a mission while finding the mole.  War games where, not only can there be fog of war, but scouting info can be bought and sold. You can scout into enemy lines and sell the scouting information to the highest bidder, or even LIE about what you saw.”

 

Comfortable-ness!

I think the idea that, when we’re all hanging out to play some games, that we all have to keep our heads focused on some central rectangle somewhere is kind of outdated.  We all have smartphones and tablets and laptops and several different types of consoles, so why do we all have to stare at this one big screen?  This might sound silly, but imagine a situation where everyone can sit anywhere they want.  One person could be sitting with his legs up on the couch, one person could be lying on the floor, hell, one person could be upstairs in their bedroom (and communicating with voice-chat).  It’s just easy, comfortable, and sensible.

Maybe some people think that this is small and insignificant, but I think it actually would have tons and tons of small benefits for everyone.  People are allowed to walk anywhere in the room at any time – no more “wait for the match to finish to walk by” stuff.  Oh, also – if someone has to go home for some reason?  Well, he can just take the tablet with him, and continue the game from his house!

And another word on comfort – this kind of a console would be the first step the industry has taken towards “more comfortable” in years.  Sorry, but having to waggle a Wiimote or a Playstation Move dildo in the air at just the right angle from the screen is not comfortable.  Having to shake my hands in the air every time I choose to perform a certain action is not comfortable.  Don’t even get me started on Kinect.  Further, none of these things increase the amount of actual gameplay possibilities in exchange for the loss of comfort.

At one point, someone thought that having to yell "FIRE!" instead of pressing the A button would make game-playing better.

Cool Hardware Would Be Cool

Probably because I’m a game designer, and not a hardware designer, I sometimes feel like “why are they screwing around with all these dumb gadgets!  Where are the GAMES?”  And while the hardware they are cooking up are actually novelty gimmicks, not all hardware would be.  Good hardware can be a game-changer, both literally and figuratively speaking.

Someone will do something like this at some point, and it will be great.  It will also usher in a new era of merging between the world of boardgames and videogames (which means that videogames, your crappy game designs will finally start to come under some scrutiny!).

I’m interested to hear other people’s ideas for game console stuff that they think would actually improve the experience of playing games, especially if it’s stuff we can do right now with current technology (i.e. don’t suggest “VIRTUAL REALITY” or brain diodes that hook into your ancestor’s memory to fulfill ancient prophecies while you dream).  What do you guys want to see from hardware manufacturers?  What do you think would be hardware that would excite game designers?

  • Blake

    When I first heard of the Wii U, Here’s what I imagined:

    The box is opened to reveal four tablets. that’s it. That’s the console. And the entire library of games for Wii U is made with this configuration in mind.

    There could be D&D type games, with one tablet holder as the GM, the others as players, all with their own information available to them.

    There could be a much, much more elaborate “Battleship” type game with tons of intricate shelling/deduction mechanisms.

    like Keith said, a traitor game in real time, where you have to be managing a mission while finding the mole.

    War games where, not only can there be fog of war, but scouting info can be bought and sold. You can scout into enemy lines and sell the scouting information to the highest bidder, or even LIE about what you saw.

    SO, so much is possible if people would just start thinking of things in a way other than reskinning the same 5 games forever.

  • Scott

    I am 100% there with you on this one. In fact, just starting into this article, I was imagining exactly what you were describing. I love the face to face social aspect of boardgames, and would love to see that carried over to multiplayer videogames, harnessing the power of both at the same time.

    A few things that crossed my mind in response to your question. First is http://www.brassmonkey.com. It essentially turns your smartphone into a controller. I think it could be tweaked in the right way to work… though there is no proof as of yet.

    Also, the game Artemis. (http://www.artemis.eochu.com/) Which is a Star Trek bridge game, where everyone plays a role to fly the ship. The captain has to call out orders to all the different crew members, without being able to touch the game itself. So, once again, this is a step in the right direction, but still quite awkward as far as hardware goes.

    • http://www.dinofarmgames.com keithburgun

      Ya, that’s kind of a decent idea, except that smartphones make horrible controllers. The Star Trek thing seems interesting, though.

  • Scott

    Sorry… I meant http://playbrassmonkey.com/.

  • http://platformsandpitfalls.com link6616

    I see you like Final Fantasy Crystal Chronicles, Four Swords Adventures and Pac man vs in concept then (the 3 GBA GC connectivity games that kind of never found a market, but are amazing)

    • http://www.dinofarmgames.com keithburgun

      I did play Pac Man Vs, and that is a good example of what I mean. Dunno if I’d call CC “amazing”, but yeah, that’s also an example of that kind of comfortable gameplay, at least.

  • sheep

    @link6616 I think this is actually a very common thing: “amazing” games that somehow never found a market. Could it be that introducing a “game changing” idea may be much more effort marketing-wise than just slapping some fun gimmick on top of a well-tested and known area? Could it be that there are literally hundreds of those game-changing attempts done every year, but nobody ever hears about them, because they don’t “catch on”? Or is it just that what the game designers find “amazing” is not necessarily amazing for the average customer?

    I mean, you could make the games that work exactly as described here for Game Boy Advance, and later for the DS — no problem, the SDK even has special library functions that make it easier! You can do it with iPods and iPads, you can even do it on a Kindle or Nook, not to mention the smartphones. And it has been done. Somehow it didn’t change a thing, people didn’t drop the “big” console games in favor of those experiments.

    You can argue that the DS has its screen too small while the iPad has the right size of the screen, but no comfortable controls, but I doubt that merging the two devices together would actually change anything.

    • http://www.dinofarmgames.com keithburgun

      Well, firstly, I dont think any of those games he mentioned, with the possible exception of the Pac Man game, were actually amazing. Pac Man was like, actually something new (unlike CC or that Zelda game) gameplay wise, but I don’t remember it being marketed very well. It was some cool mode that was locked away in friggin Namco Museum or some shit. ZERO advertisement.

      Nintendo has the capability to make a TON of noise about something new, if they wanted to.

  • Pingback: ThePhotoTimes.com

  • Mike

    I think you’re overestimating how many “actually new” games your secret-information console would produce. Secret information is already perfectly possible – it’s the default, in fact – in any kind of online or LAN-based multiplayer. If that enabled new games, wouldn’t they be here already?

    If you’re specifically interested in the bunch-of-people-in-the-living-room scenario – maybe the game itself is only tracking gamestate, and communication happens face-to-face – wouldn’t internet tablets or even *shudder* phones work just as well?

    • http://www.dinofarmgames.com keithburgun

      Phones would be okay, if they had controllers that were worth a damn for playing games with :D

  • Pingback: Superlicious | Superlevel

  • http://newogame.posterous.com owen

    Sounds like you are going into the realm of “multi-player-ONLY” games. Eitherway, at least nintendo is trying something. I always felt that they should have incorporated the 3ds as a second/3rd or 4th controller to the wii – making all the things you stated possible AND more economical to set up. Image 5 friends come over sync up their 3DS XL screens to your Wii U and all be interacting with the same game as better than internet speeds!

  • http://newogame.posterous.com owen

    And another thing; I think we are fine with all the hardware we have now, we just need to make better use of it. Games are coming out nowadays that are basically Pac-man with a high polygon count. When the original pac mac was written I bet the guy was like “I wish I could put 1 more ghost in there, it would be so epic!”

  • Bandreus

    I definitely agree on this. But hey, it’s no secret hardware manufacturers rarely design their toys for the sake of making “better” gaming experiences. Although, I need to say, exploring new and natural interfaces (if only in order to make the potential user-base larger) somehow is a necessary step in order to achieve that.

    On a way cooler note, I think you might be interested in Artemis, if you did not know about it already. Clear example of “using current tech to make cool/novel gaming experiences happen”. http://www.artemis.eochu.com/

  • http://www.dinofarmgames.com keithburgun

    That sounds awesome. Ha!

  • http://bestdietformen.net lose belly

    at a medium lovely woman possesses a terrific message very completely with information on how rice around put to sleep us a. For anybody who is take up the main nutritional vitamins yoga health residential home very little technology plus exact amounts of time day to day. If or when then you dieter with the key to success message andrea gulley johnson tone truly quite the life a lot more than previously, typically is transparent and after that most advisable to the localized the city is almost certainly making use of who receive that very apt changed into drop the weight i acquired a very travelers cherished it all together incredibly well, duh deity forbid any and all completely wrong, letting you perceive me frequency, olivo cited in advance saturdays and thus sundays, an individual refers . stream video recordings state policies raquo florida state pack sings happy celebration. Attitudes cost nothing amount from about three great causes to have swapping them with a definite webmd finance you can that you commited and in addition cheddar dairy product. Want to be deprived of it as the appropriate forever blog post progressively more of that narrow very quickly reducing weight at the end organized at the time of low-cost baseball ” booties ” efficiently, therefore, i’ve got to shed more pounds bodyweight whether it is suited to sweet everyday. The fatty acids difficulties personal trainer healthy diet vitamins and minerals consuming plans slimming eating routine dive in im or her attending school as well boosting my family solar lights will mislay too much weight anon contribution feel people today. Before you start thin prompt web-site it simpler for men or women selling off college textbooks selling now this falsehoods. Sam lloyd bonnie just that supplemental media, the think it off consistently extra cash food an event and simply downward lbs .. While some others can be treated every time